Specify the classroom assumptions

This separate fictional, one-year example is not an actual investment or a presumed Blueprint Court partnership. All amounts are in U.S. dollars. Investors contribute $1 million, the sponsor contributes no capital and the simple, noncompounding preference is eight percent. Capital returns first, preference follows and remaining cash is divided eighty percent to investors and twenty percent to the sponsor, without catch-up.

Read the shortfall case

With $1.04 million available after obligations and reserves, the sequence returns $1 million of capital and leaves $40,000 for preference. The full stated preference is $80,000, so it is only partly paid. No residual remains for a sponsor promote. The agreement would determine later treatment of the unpaid amount; the percentage alone cannot answer that question.

Translate before calculating

Before modeling a real arrangement, ask qualified counsel and the financial reviewer to establish available cash, sequence, timing, compounding, catch-up and treatment of deficits. Different terms produce different allocations even with the same headline percentages. This illustration teaches a reading method, not expected performance, investment suitability or fundraising practice. Actual ownership and securities questions require professional review before commitments or investment communications.

Take the next step

Explore the curriculum

General information—not personalized legal, tax, investment, engineering or architectural advice.